Ok here goes

10/06- Retained a bk atty--Informed him of situation prior to him accepting fee's for a chp 13. Filing fee is only $250-$300--He DEMANDS $1800 up front as bk attys want fees up front for some of the work they'll have to do. We'll let you know when you need to pay us more.

He was told prior to accepting our case we knew the 2nd lien holder tried to foreclose illegally. I knew it was illegal bcuz we stopped the 1st foreclosure by trying to get something worked out to find out they were trying to foreclose not knowing who owned our debt.

As expected they filed a proof of claim to be paid in the bk court. And after giving them a few mnths they finally provided the bk judge a blank assignment document. This to us is a false proof of claim cause even after this they tried to hand off to a different atty.

Since I still had an atty at this time he or the trustee should of moved forward with an adversary and possibly an appeal. But because of the difficulities we've faced they didn't do. My atty at this point did send a letter to the trustee who did NOTHING!

I know from a couple of the letters I actually have in writing(from my atty show judges biased) the judges thought on this that he didn't believe they wouldn't come to court without being able to prove up. But this did happen. This is a $500,000 penalty or 5 yrs in jail or both. Nothing has happened to them.

I went back and reviewed the proof of claim put in by Citi. If I have only one mortgage why are they putting down 10 different entitites under the Citi name as owner of my debt? This to me means they've yet to PROVE OWNERSHIP IN HAND AND I'VE HELD THIS LIKE GOLDSEEKER SAID ONCE FROM THE OLD SITE LIKE Michael Vick in a Dog FIGHT...

Prior to any lift of stays being given in court I can show I had capable banker friends interested in purchasing non-perf debts or def bal ge notes...Neither deal happened. Not because of their stringent requirements and cash facility but because of Citi. One only had 150k per month to spend...they would only deal with him if he had $3-6m per mnth to spend...The next client with 10m-50m per mnth to spend couldn't get business done bcuz Citi likes to SCAM! They wanted to make money on the worst possible debts after they sell them. Anyway the 1st banko got dismissed in Jan 08

Second was filed in June 08-Because of not knowing what to do with who really owes what I didn't do a plan and put in for an extension of time to file plan. Within 20 days. They said with their stamp it was approved in part and denied in part. The extension was approved for the amount of time law allows which is 15 days. Not the 20 days I requested. But their stamp didn't explain this. So when I filed my adversary without no atty the judge then wrote this...

To Let Complaint Be and it is hereby Dismissed for a LACK of Jurisdiciton, To Let Adversary Be and it is hereby closed.

To me this means leave them be. We know their doing wrong but we don't care. Prior to this is when I started learning all the crapola we didn't know.

So next I did the R4C Counterclaim Lis Pendens here in St. Louis. At 1st I put in a request for a temp restraining order...I didn't have much verbiage on it ....The Sr Dist Court Judge Denied me this. So then I went off...Then I put in motion to vacate her order....

It took her two mnths to rule. She ruled that my complaint is frivolous and summarily Denied me my rights again. Then two months later by her own motion she did a Sua Ponte Recusal. She gave a new trial and passed to a new Judge here in St. Louis, he Recused as well. Then assigned to a new judge.

Then they gave over to a magistrate in Ar. Now when the judge dismissed my adversary in bk court his clerk or whatever she is said he dismissed because of the time line issue. When I called about it being sent to a judge outside this district because of it being against a judge within this district I said well why would that be when she Denied me my rights Prior to her Recusal?

I know I actually called the state atty representing the Judge and Homeq, wf, wachovia who ever the f*** owns the 2nd. He was an up tight Piece of work...I understand what I'm up against. I understand they'll do anything to disuade me...

My thought is this. And it has made them recuse.

The whole justice system in St. Louis is on the take. My theory is the Bk judge lost Jurisdiction in the 1st bk case when he did nothing to make them rectify attempting a wrongful foreclosure. Cause even though he made it to where they wouldn't have to be paid in the bk he did nothing outside of the bk to recitfy the wrongful foreclsoure they brought on. Didn't do anything about the $500,000 penalty or 5 yrs in jail penalty. So now I think the Bk Judge, Trustee possibly a chp 7 trustee should all be jailed here in St. Louis.

I believe the 2nd bk he dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction because I brought out the truth about what they were attempting to do to me which is steal my home! Which now they've been successful with. Therefore, they are complacet with the fraud.

If the two Judges who Recused them self had NO JURISDICTION SHOULDN'T their orders of been dismissed for NO Jurisdiction vs a recusal prior to going to a magistrate who wasn't suppose to be involved anyway? How does it benefit to say NO JURISDICTION WHEN YOU ALREADY ADMITTED THINGS ARE SO BAD YOU HAVE TO RECUSE NOT DISMISS FOR A LACK OF JURISDICTION.Are Dist Court Judges the only ones with Article III powers?

If this is the case couldn't the magistrate's order be vacated? And the others have their oaths/bonds properly attacked? Unfortuantely, I've found other cases I think that show the bk judge is helping them steal homes. That's the other point that got the Judges to Recuse...They know I know full circle their rigged ring of fire. And are besides themselves.

How would you handle such a thing? Surely if you give them jurisdiction to steal your home you have to be able to rectify them stealing your home. Would you appeal? If so which case to appeal? Since this is such an issue that effects MILLIONS...TO ME .....If I can't put something in court showing evidence of what they've done and be heard than we're all had ! Trying to run from the truth with a dismissal doesn't mean it'll end....

Would you maybe do like a cross joined complaint? Or just do long videos like David here and see if they get the point across? Forget produce the note! Produce who has the right to settle that note or sell the note? I WANT THE ORIGINAL....