November 26, 2009 4:31 PM PST
Science untarnished by 'Climategate,' U.N. says

Obama Science Officials Defend Global Warming Research in 'Climategate'

CRU's Source Code: Climategate Uncovered

By Marc Sheppard

[quote][
But here's what’s undeniable: If a divergence exists between measured temperatures and those derived from dendrochronological data after (circa) 1960, then discarding only the post-1960 figures is disingenuous, to say the least. The very existence of a divergence betrays a potential serious flaw in the process by which temperatures are reconstructed from tree-ring density. If it's bogus beyond a set threshold, then any honest man of science would instinctively question its integrity prior to that boundary. And only the lowliest would apply a hack in order to produce a desired result.


And to do so without declaring as such in a footnote on every chart in every report in every study in every book in every classroom on every website that such a corrupt process is relied upon is not just a crime against science, it’s a crime against mankind.


Indeed, miners of the CRU folder have unearthed dozens of e-mail threads and supporting documents revealing much to loathe about this cadre of hucksters and their vile intentions. This veritable goldmine has given us tales ranging from evidence destruction to spitting on the Freedom of Information Act on both sides of the Atlantic. But the now-irrefutable evidence that alarmists have indeed been cooking the data for at least a decade may be the most important strike in human history.


Advocates of the global governance/financial redistribution sought by the United Nations at Copenhagen in two weeks, and also those of the expanded domestic governance/financial redistribution sought by Liberal politicians, both substantiate their drastic proposals with the pending climate emergency predicted in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Kyoto, Waxman-Markey, Kerry-Boxer, EPA regulation of the very substances of life -- all bad policy concepts enabled solely by IPCC reports. And the IPCC in turn bases those reports largely on the data and charts provided by the research scientists at CRU -- largely from tree ring data -- who just happen to be editors and lead authors of that same U.N. panel.
/QUOTE]



Climategate Program Code Analyzed

American Thinker's Mark Sheppard has gone through folders and sub-folders of . Near the end of his article.. ... Near the end of his article, Sheppard declares (emphasis added)...

Cover Up Is In The Code — Smoking Gun Update!


Update: Another SW engineer concludes the CRU code shows clear data manipulating to cool off the 1940's warm period and warm up the currently cooling period ... For details on some of the smoking guns found in the CRU code check this out:





ClimateGate Smoking Gun Found, American Thinker Does Media's Job

As NewsBusters has been reporting since the ClimateGate scandal first broke last Friday.. ... With that in mind, the American Thinker's Marc Sheppard, clearly doing the media's job, examined the computer program source code available in what was hacked from this British Climate Research Unit (CRU), and discovered that this scandal is everything




A Great Summary of the Fraud


American Thinker:As the evidence of climate fraud at the University of East Anglia’s prestigious Climactic Research Unit (CRU) continues to mount, those who’ve been caught green-handed continue to parry their due opprobrium and comeuppance

Continued